Montague Summers, The Philosophy of Vampirism (1928), chapter four
It may now be
asked how a human being becomes a vampire, and list the causes generally believed
to predispose persons to this demoniacal condition.
The vampire is one
who has led a life of more than ordinary immorality and wickedness; a man
of foul, gross and selfish passions, of evil ambitions, delighting in cruelty
and blood.
Arthur Machen has shrewdly
pointed out that "Sorcery and sanctity are the only realities. Each is an
ecstasy, a withdrawal from the common life. The spiritual world cannot be
confined to the supremely good, but the supremely wicked necessarily have
their portion in it. The ordinary man can no more be a great sinner than he
can be a great saint. Most of us are just indifferent, mixed-up creatures;
we muddle through the world without realizing the meaning and inner sense
of things, and consequently our wickedness and goodness are alike second rate.
"The saint endeavours
to recover a gift which he has lost; the sinner tries to obtain something
which was never his. In brief, he repeats the Fall. It is not the mere liar
who is excluded by those words; it is, above all, the 'sorcerers' who use
the failings incidental to material life as instruments to obtain their infinitely
wicked ends. And let me tell you this; our higher senses are so blunted, we
are so drenched with materialism, that we should probably fail to recognize
real wickedness if we encountered it."
It has been said that
a saint is a person who always chooses the better of two courses open to him
at every step. And so the man who is truly wicked is he who always chooses
the worse. Even when he does things which would be considered right, he always
does them for some bad reason. To identify oneself in this way with any given
course requires intense concentration and an iron strength of will, and it
is such persons who become vampires.
The vampire is believed
to be one who has devoted himself during life to the practise of black magic.
It is hardly to be supposed that such persons would rest undisturbed, while
it is easy to believe that their malevolence had set in action forces which
might prove powerful for terror and destruction even when they were in their
graves. It was sometimes said, though the belief is rare, that the vampire
was the offspring of a witch and the Devil.
With the exception
of England, where witches were invariably hanged, the universal penalty for
witchcraft was the stake. Cremation, the burning of the dead body, is considered
to be one of the few ways in which vampirism can be stamped out. That witches
were hanged in England has often been commented upon with some surprise, and
persons who travelled in France and Italy were inclined to advise the same
punishment should be inflicted at home as in all other countries. It was felt
that unless the body were utterly consumed, it might well prove that they
had not stamped out the noxious thing.
It is even recorded
that in one case the witch herself considered that she should be sent to the
stake. A rich farmer in Northamptonshire had made an enemy of a woman named
Ann Foster. Thirty of his sheep were discovered dead with their "Leggs broke
in pieces, and their Bones all shattered in their Skins." Shortly after, his
house and several of his barns were found ablaze. It was suspected that Ann
Foster had brought this about by sorcery. She was tried upon this charge at
Northampton in 1674, and "After Sentence of Death was past upon her, she mightily
desired to be Burned; but the Court would give no Ear to that, but that she
should be hanged at the Common place of Execution."
The vampire is also
believed to be one who for some reason is buried with mutilated rites. It
will be remarked that this idea has a very distinct connection with the anxious
care taken by the Greek and Roman of classical times that the dead should
be consigned to the tomb with full and solemn ceremony.
To the modern man burial
in the earth, or it may be cremation, is a necessary and decorous manner for
the disposal of the dead. Yet in the Greek imagination these rites implied
something far more. So long as the body remains, the soul might be in some
way tied and painfully linked with it. The dissolution of the body meant that
the soul was no longer detained in this world where it had no appointed place,
but was able to pass without let or hindrance to its own mansion prepared
for it, and for which it was prepared.
Of old, men dutifully
assisted the dead in this manner as a pious obligation, and were prepared
to go to any length to fulfil this obligation. It was in later years, especially
under the influence of Slavonic tradition, that not only love but fear compelled
them to perform this duty to the dead, since it was generally thought that
those whose bodies were not dissolved might return, re-animated corpses, the
vampire eager to satisfy his vengeance upon the living, his lust for sucking
hot, reeking blood. The fulfilment of these funereal duties was a protection
for themselves as well as a benefit to the departed.
Very closely linked
with this idea is the belief that those who die under the ban of the Church
become vampires. Excommunication is the principal and most serious penalty
the Church can inflict. It deprives the guilty of all participation in the
common spiritual benefits enjoyed by all members of the Christian society.
The excommunicated person does not cease to be a Christian, for his baptism
can never be effaced, but he is considered an exile and even, one may say,
as non-existing in the sight of ecclesiastical authority.
Among the Jews exclusion
from the synagogue was a real excommunication. The apostles were told: "They
will put you out of the synagogues; yea, the hour cometh that whosoever killeth
you will think that he doth a service to God." This penalty foreshadowed later
censures, for Jesus said: "In the mouth of two or three witnesses every word
may stand. And if he will not hear the Church, let him be to thee as the heathen
and Publican. Amen I say to you, whatsoever you shall bind on earth, shall
be bound also in Heaven; and whatsoever you shall loose upon earth shall be
loosed also in Heaven."
According to the Orthodox
Church this power was transmitted to the successors of the apostles, that
is to say the bishops, so they too had the faculty of binding and loosing.
But something very definite was further implied. This faculty had actual physical
consequences, and the Greeks held that excommunication arrested the decomposition
of a body after death. In fact the incorruptibility of the body of any person
bound by a curse was made a definite doctrine of the Orthodox Church.
Accordingly, forms
of absolution had to be provided which might be read over bodies found in
such a condition, for it was thought that this might be brought about by well-nigh
any curse. One such absolution runs thus: "Yea, O Lord our God, let Thy great
mercy and marvellous compassion prevail; and whether this Thy servant lieth
under curse of father or mother, or under his own imprecation, or did provoke
one of Thy holy ministers and sustained at his hands a bond that hath not
been loosed, or did incur the most grievous ban of excommunication by a bishop,
and through heedlessness and sloth obtained not pardon, pardon Thou him by
the hand of Thy sinful and unworthy servant; resolve Thou his body into that
from which it was made; and establish his soul in the tabernacle of saints."
Naturally, as is clearly
expressed, the curse which the Orthodox Church regarded as most weighty was
the ban of excommunication by a bishop, which doomed the offender to remain
whole after death, and the body was not freed until absolution had been read
over it and the excommunication formally revoked. However, a difficulty arose.
It was discovered that excommunication sometimes failed to produce the expected
physical result and the body crumbled to dust in the ordinary way. So extraordinary
a circumstance was immediately submitted to a conclave of expert theologians
who, after long debate, decided that any excommunicated person whose body
did not remain whole had no more hope of salvation because he was no longer
in a state to be "loosed", but that he was already damned in hell.
Leone Allacci considered
this Orthodox dogma of the physical results of excommunication and subsequent
absolution to be certain beyond any matter of dispute, and he mentions several
cases, which he says were well known and proved, which demonstrate the truth
of this belief. Athanasius, Metropolitan of Imbros, recorded that at the request
of the citizens of Thasos he read a solemn absolution over several bodies,
and before the holy words were even finished all had dissolved into dust.
An even more remarkable
instance is that of a priest who pronounced a sentence of excommunication
and afterwards turned Mohammedan. This did not affect the victim of his curse
who, though he had died in the Christian faith, yet remained "bound." This
circumstance was reported to the Metropolitan Raphael. At his earnest request
the Mohammedan, after much delay and hesitation, consented to read the absolution
over the body of the dead Christian. As he was pronouncing the final words
the body fell completely to dust. The Mohammedan thereupon returned to his
former faith, and was put to death for so doing.
Ricaut's The Present
State of the Greek and Armenian Churches, 1679, says of the power of excommunication:"The
effect of this dreadful Sentence is reported by the Greek Priests to
have been in several instances so evident, that none doubts or disbelieves
the consequences of all those maledictions repeated therein; and particularly,
that the body of an excommunicated person is not capable of returning to its
first Principles until the Sentence of Excommunication is taken off.
"It would be esteemed
no Curse amongst us to have our bodies remain uncorrupted and entire in the
Grave, who endeavour by Art, and Aromatic spices, and Gums, to preserve them
from Corruption: And it is also accounted amongst the Greeks themselves,
as a miracle and particular grace and favour of God to the Bodies of such
whom they have Canonized for Saints to continue unconsumed, and in the moist
damps of a Vault, to dry and desiccate like the Mummies in Egypt, or
in the Hot sands of Arabia. But they believe that the Bodies of the
Excommunicated are possessed in the Grave by some evil spirit, which actuates
and preserves them from Corruption, in the same manner as the soul informes
and animates the living body; and that they feed in the night, walk, digest,
and are nourished, and have been found ruddy in Complexion, and their Veins,
after forty days Burial, extended with Blood, which, being opened with a Lancet,
have yielded a gore as plentiful, fresh, and quick, as that which issues from
the Vessels of young and sanguine persons.
"This is so generally
believed and discoursed of amongst the Greeks, that there is scarce
one of their Country Villages but what can witness and recount several instances
of this nature, both by the relation of their Parents, and Nurses, as well
as of their own knowledge, which they tell with as much variety as we do the
Tales of Witches and Enchantments, of which it is observed in Conversation,
that scarce one story is ended before another begins of like wonder."
It is now necessary
to enquire into certain extraordinary cases which are recorded, and which
are true beyond all manner of doubt, of persons who died excommunicated and
whose bodies were seen to rise from the tomb and leave the sacred precincts
where they were buried. In the first place we have the very famous account
given by St.Gregory the Great of the two dead nuns, generally called the "Suore
Morte."
Two ladies of an illustrious
family had been admitted to the sisterhood of St.Scholastica. Although in
most respects exemplary and faithful to their vows, they could not refrain
from scandal, gossip and vain talk. Now St.Benedict was the first to lay down
the strictest and most definite laws concerning the observance of silence.
In all monasteries and convents there are particular places and special times
wherein speaking is unconditionally prohibited. Outside these places and times
there are usually accorded "recreations" during which conversation is not
only permitted but encouraged, though it must be governed by rules of charity
and moderation. Useless and idle prattling is universally forbidden at all
times and places. Accordingly, when it was reported to St.Benedict that the
two nuns were greatly given to babble indiscreetly, the holy Abbot was sore
displeased, and sent them a message to the effect that if they did not learn
to refrain their tongues and give a better example to the community he must
excommunicate them.
At first the sisters
were alarmed and penitent, and promised to mend their idle ways; but the treacherous
habit was too strong for their good resolves; they continued to give offense
by their naughty chatter, and in the midst of their folly they suddenly died.
Being of a great and ancient house they were buried in the church near the
high altar; and afterwards on a certain day, whilst a solemn High Mass was
being sung, before the Liturgy of the Faithful began, the Catechumens were
dismissed by the Deacon crying: "Let those who are forbidden to partake, let
those who are excommunicated, depart from hence and leave us!" Behold, in
the sight of all the people the two nuns rose up from their graves, and with
faces drooping and averted, they glided sadly out of the Church. And thus
it happened every time the Holy Mysteries were celebrated, until their old
nurse interceded with St.Benedict, and he had pity upon them and absolved
them from all their sins so that they might rest in peace.
St.Gregory also relates
that a young monk left his monastery without permission and without receiving
any blessing or dismissal from the Abbot. Unhappily he died before he could
be reconciled, and was duly buried in consecrated ground. On the next morning
his corpse was discovered lying huddled up and thrown out of his grave. His
relations in terror hastened to St.Benedict, who gave them a consecrated Host
and told them to put It with all possible reverence upon the breast of the
young religious. This was done, and the tomb was never again found to have
cast forth the body.
This custom of putting
a Eucharistic Particle in the grave with a dead person was by no means unknown
in former centuries. It is said that even today in many places throughout
Greece upon the lips of the dead is laid a crumb of consecrated bread from
the Eucharist. Out of reverence this has often been replaced by a fragment
of pottery on which is cut the sign of the Cross. Theodore Burt in The
Cyclades informs us that locally in Naxos the object thus employed is
a wax cross and this moreover still bears the name "fare", showing that the
tradition is closely connected with the old custom of placing the "ferryman's
coin" in the mouth of a dead man, the fee for Charon.
Now Charon, who has
assumed the form Charos, is entirely familiar to the modern Greek peasant,
but not merely as classical literature depicts him, the boatman of the Styx.
He is Death itself, the lord of ghosts and shadows. Until recent years the
practice prevailed in many parts of Greece of placing in the mouth of the
deceased a small coin, and in the district of Smyrna this was actually known
as "passage money." Yet strangely enough although both custom and name survived,
the reason for the coin had been forgotten. Possibly the original meaning
of the coin has vanished in the mists of dateless antiquity, and even in classical
days the original significance was lost, so it came then to be explained that
the coin was Charon's fee; whereas this is but a late and incorrect interpretation
of a custom whose meaning went deeper than that, which had existed before
mythology knew of a ferryman of hell.
The soul is supposed
to escape by the mouth, which as it is an exit from the body is also the entrance
to the body, and naturally it is by this path that the soul, if it were to
return to the body, would re-enter; or by which an evil spirit or demon would
make its way into the body. The coin or charm seems most likely to have been
a safeguard against any happening of this kind. In Christian days the Holy
Eucharist or a fragment inscribed with sacred names will be the best preventative.
Moreover, not infrequently the piece of pottery placed in the mouth of the
dead has scratched upon it the pentacle of magic lore. It is extremely significant
that in Myconos this sign is often carved on house doors to preserve the inmates
from the vampire. So in Greece at all events the custom of burying a consecrated
Particle with a corpse, or of putting a crumb of the Host between the dead
man's lips originated as a spell to counteract the possibility of vampirism.
It should be remarked
that a consecrated Host placed in the tomb where a vampire is buried will
assuredly prevent the vampire from issuing forth out of his grave, but for
obvious reasons this is a remedy which is not to be essayed since it savours
of rashness and profanation of God's body.
There are in history
many other examples of excommunicated persons who have not been able to rest
in consecrated ground. In the year 1030, St.Godard, Bishop of Hildesheim in
Lower Saxony, was obliged to excommunicate certain persons for their crimes
and filthy sacrileges. Nevertheless, so powerful were the barons and overlords,
their protectors, that they buried the bodies of their followers in the Cathedral
itself, in the very sanctuary.
Upon this the bishop
launched the ban of excommunication against them also; but none the less,
utterly disregarding the censures, they forced their way into the various
churches. Upon the next high festival the rebellious nobles were present with
a throng of armed attendants in the Cathedral itself. The aisles were packed
with worshippers and afar off, spanned by the vaulted roof, the High Altar
blazed with a myriad tapers whose glow was reflected in the mirror of polished
gold and the crystal heart of great reliquaries. The Bishop, his canons around
him, pontificated the Mass. But after the Gospel, St.Godard turned from the
altar and, in ringing tones of command, bade all those who were under any
censure or ban to leave the sacred building.
The living smiled contemptuously,
shrugged a little and did not stir. But down the aisles were seen to glide
in awful silence dark shadowy figures, from whom the crowds shrank in speechless
dread. They seemed to pass through the doors out of the sacred place. When
the service was done the Bishop absolved the dead, and lo, the ghostly train
appeared to re-enter their tombs. Thereupon the living were so struck with
fear that they sought to be reconciled, and after due penance absolution was
granted them.
An extraordinary circumstance
is related by Wipert, Archdeacon of the celebrated see of Toul, who wrote
the life of Pope St. Leo IX. The historian tells us that some years before
the death of St. Leo in 1054, the citizens of Narni, a little burgh picturesquely
situated on a lofty rock at the point where the river Nera forces its way
through a narrow ravine to join the Tiber, were one day greatly surprised
and alarmed to see a mysterious company of persons who appeared to be advancing
towards the town. The magistrates, fearing some surprise, gave orders that
the gates should be fast closed, whilst the inhabitants betook themselves
to the walls. The procession, however, which was clothed in white and seemed
from time to time to vanish among the morning mists, was obviously no inimical
band. They passed on their way without turning to right or left, and it is
said they seemed to be defiling with measured pace almost till eventide. All
wondered who these persons could be, and at last one of the most prominent
citizens resolved to address them.
To his amazement he
saw among them a certain person who had been his host many years before, and
of whose death he had lately been informed. Calling him loudly by name he
asked: "Who are you, and whence cometh this throng?" "I am your old friend,"
was the reply, "and this multitude is phantom; we have not yet atoned for
the sins we committed whilst on earth, and we are not yet deemed worthy to
enter the Kingdom of Heaven; therefore are we sent forth as humble penitents,
lowly palmers, whose lot it is with pains and much moil to visit the holy
sanctuaries of the world, such as are appointed to us in order. At this hour
we are come from the shrine of St.Martin, and we are on our way to the sanctuary
of Our Lady of Farfa."
The good man was so
terrified at these words that he fell as in a fit, and he remained ill for
a twelvemonth. It was he who related this extraordinary event to Pope St.
Leo IX. With regard to the company there could be no mistake; it was not seen
by one person or even by a few, but by the whole town. Although naturally
enough the appearance of so vast a number would give rise to no little alarm,
since hostile designs would be suspected, so crowded a pilgrimage in the eleventh
century would not by any means be a unique, even if it were an exceptional
event. Whole armies of pious persons were traversing Europe from shrine to
shrine, whilst enthusiasm for the pilgrimage to Jerusalem was greatly on the
increase and was, before many years had passed, to culminate in the Crusades.
It is not said that
it was actually the bodies of those who were dead seen passing by the walls
of Narni. On the contrary we are given to understand that it was a spectral
host, but with regard to those persons who were excommunicated we are to believe
that physically they are bound by the ban, and that in the cases of resuscitation
it is the actual body which appears.
The Greeks, as we have
seen, generally regarded the fact that a body was found intact as a sign that
the person had died excommunicate or under some curse. It is now necessary
to consider an aspect of the question which is diametrically opposed to this
idea, namely those cases where incorruption is an evidence of extraordinary
sanctity, when the mortal remains of some great saint having been exhumed
after death are found to be miraculously preserved for the veneration of the
faithful.
Perhaps one of the
most remarkable instances is that of the Poor Clare, St.Catherine of Bologna,
who died 9 March 1463, and whose body is venerated in a small yet exquisitely
elegant sanctuary attached to the convent of Corpus Domini at Bologna. It
is a remarkable circumstance that here it is not preserved under crystal or
glass but is seated, dressed in sumptuous brocades, jewelled and crowned,
in an embroidered chair in the centre of the room. The body is desiccated
but in no sense decayed.
In Montefalco, high
among the Umbrian uplands, lies the body of the Augustinian St.Clare, one
of the glories of that ancient Order so rich in hallowed and venerable names,
and one of the most marvellous ecstaticas of all time. Born about 1275, she
became Abbess of the Convent of Montefalco and seemed to dwell more in Heaven
than on Earth. Gifted with the spirit of prophecy and the grace of working
miracles, she was the subject of extraordinary ecstasies and raptures, which
were prolonged from days to weeks. She died 17 August 1308, and when her heart
was extracted from her body , it was opened and therein impressed upon the
very flesh were seen a figure of Christ crucified, the scourge, the Crown
of Thorns, the column, the lance, three nails, the sponge and reed. This relic
is venerated at Montefalco today.
Even now her body lies
there perfect and intact. The hands and face are clearly visible, exquisitely
pale and lovely, untouched by any fleck of corruption. It has not been embalmed,
but Lorenzo Tardy says that throughout Italy of all the bodies of Saints which
are venerated incorrupt, the body of St.Clare of Montefalco is the loveliest
and most free from any spot or blemish through the passing years. Moreover
when her heart was opened the blood flowed forth in great abundance and was
carefully collected in a glass vial. Although normally coagulated it has preserved
in colour a bright fresh red as though newly spilled. At rare intervals this
blood liquifies and becomes humid, lucent, transparent and freely-flowing.
On occasion it has been known actually to spume and bubble.
This list might be
greatly prolonged without much research or difficulty. The phenomenon of the
incorruptibility of the body is in itself not to be regarded as evidence of
sanctity, but the preservation of the body of a person who has led a life
of heroic virtue, when this has been officially and authoratively recognized,
may be admitted as a miracle, that is to say as supernatural.
As incorruptibility
is often attached to sanctity, so it is an essential of the very opposite
of holiness, the demonism of the vampire. It has been said that the vampire,
as a demon, reanimates the corpses of entirely innocent people, but this is
very doubtful. It is probable that the only bodies thus to be infested and
preserved by dark agency are those of persons who during their lives were
distinguished by deeds of no ordinary atrocity. Very often too, the vampire
is a corpse reanimated by his own spirit who seeks to continue his own life
in death by preying upon others and feeding himself upon their vitality. That
is to say, by absorbing their blood, since blood is the principle of life.
Dr .T. Claye Shaw in
his study, A Prominent Motive in Murder (The Lancet, June 1909),
has given us a most valuable and suggestive paper upon the natural fascination
of blood which may be repelling or attractant; and since Dr. Havelock Ellis
has acutely remarked that "there is scarcely any natural object with so profoundly
emotional an effect as blood," it is easy to understand how nearly blood is
connected with the sexual manifestations, and how distinctly erotic and provocative
the sight or even the thought of blood almost inevitably proves.
It would appear to
be Plumroder who, in 1830, was the first to draw definite attention to the
connection between sexual passions and blood. The voluptuous sensations excited
by blood give rise to that lust for blood which Dr. Shaw terms haemothymia.
A vast number of cases have been recorded in which persons who are normal
find intense pleasure in the thought of blood during their sexual relations,
although perhaps if blood were actually flowing they might feel repulsion.
Normally the fascination of blood, if present at all during sexual excitement,
remains more or less latent, either because it is weak or because the checks
that inhibit it are inevitably very powerful.
Blood is the vital
essence, but even without any actual sucking of blood there is a vampire who
can , consciously or perhaps unconsciously , support his life and re-energize
his frame by drawing on the vitality of others. He may be called a spiritual
vampire or, as he has been dubbed, a "psychic sponge." Such types are by no
means uncommon. Sensitive people will often complain of weariness and loss
of spirits when they have been for long in the company of certain others.
Laurence Oliphant in
his Scientific Religion has said: "Many persons are so constituted
that they have, unconsciously to themselves, an extraordinary faculty for
sucking the life-principle from others, who are constitutionally incapable
of retaining their vitality." Breeders tell us that young animals should not
be herded with old ones. Doctors forbid young children being put to sleep
with aged individuals. It will be remembered that when King David was old
and ailing his forces were recruited by having a young maiden brought into
closest contact with him, although he was no longer able to copulate.
In an article on vampires
in Borderland, July 1896, Dr. Franz Hartmann mentions the "psychic
sponge" or mental vampire. He says: "They unconsciously vampirize every sensitive
person with whom they come in contact, and they instinctively seek out such
persons and invite them to stay at their houses. I know of an old lady, a
vampire, who thus ruined the health of a lot of robust servant girls, whom
she took into her service and made them sleep in her room. They were all in
good health when they entered, but they soon began to sicken, they became
emaciated and consumptive and had to leave the service."
Vampirism in some sort
and to some degree may be said to leave its trace throughout almost all nature.
Just as we have parasitic men and women, so we have parasitic plants, and
at this point there imposes itself upon us some mention of the animal which
directly derives a name from habits which exactly resemble those of the Slavonic
vampire - the Vampire Bat.
There has been much
exaggeration in the accounts which travellers have given of these bats and
many of the details would seem to have been very inaccurately observed by
earlier inquirers. The Encyclopedia Britannica says that there are
only two species of blood-sucking bats known - Desmodus Rufus and Dyphylla
Ecaudata. These inhabit the tropical and part of the sub-tropical regions
of the New World, and are restricted to South and Central America. Their attacks
on men and other warm-blooded animals were noticed by very early writers.
Thus Peter Martyr, who wrote soon after the conquest of South America, says
that in the Isthmus of Darien there were bats which sucked the blood of men
and cattle when asleep to such a degree as even to kill them. Condamine in
the eighteenth century remarks that at Borja, Ecuador, and in other districts
they had wholly destroyed the cattle introduced by missionaries. Sir Robert
Schomburgh relates that at Wicki, on the river Berlice, no fowls could be
kept on account of the ravages of these creatures, which attacked their combs,
making them appear white from loss of blood.
Although long known
to Europeans, the exact species to which these bats belonged were not determined
for a long time, and in the past writers have claimed many frugivorous bats,
especially Vampyrus spectrum, a large bat of most forbidding appearance,
to be the true Vampire. Charles Darwin was able to fix at least one of the
blood-sucking species. He says that the whole circumstance was much doubted
in England, but "we were bivouacking late one night near Coquimbo in Chile,
when my servant, noticing that one of the horses was very restive, went to
see what was the matter, and fancying he could detect something, suddenly
put his hand on the beast's withers, and secured the vampire."
Travellers say the
wounds inflicted by these bats are similar to a cut from a sharp razor when
shaving. A portion of the skin is taken off and, a large number of severed
capillary vessels being thus exposed, a constant flow of blood is maintained.
From this source the blood is drawn through the exceedingly small gullet of
the bat into the intestine-like stomach, whence it is probably drawn off during
the slow process of digestion while the animal, sated with food, is hanging
in a state of torpidity from the roof of its cave, or from the inner side
of a hollow tree.
This is exactly the
vampire who with his sharp white teeth bites the neck of his victim and sucks
the blood from the wounds he has made, gorging himself like some great human
leech until he is replete, when he retires to his grave to repose, lethargic
and inert until such time as he shall again sally forth to quench his lust
at the veins of some sleek and sanguine juvenal.
No comments:
Post a Comment